Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.lnec.pt:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/16947
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTavares de Castro, A.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorHenriques, M. J.pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2009-10-13T08:28:49Zpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-21T10:34:35Zpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-09T14:21:55Zpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-13T11:17:30Z-
dc.date.available2009-10-13T08:28:49Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2010-04-21T10:34:35Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2014-10-09T14:21:55Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2017-04-13T11:17:30Z-
dc.date.issued2008-05pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.lnec.pt/jspui/handle/123456789/16947-
dc.description.abstractStructural safety control of concrete dams is based in the analysis of the response of the structure, characterized by the evolution of several variables representative of its behaviour. Among these variables are absolute and relative displacements of points of the structure and of the foundation, uplift and flow rates in the foundation, and deformations and stresses in the concrete. In particular, the analysis of the displacements is very important, because they reflect the global structural behaviour of the dam. Therefore, monitoring plans of concrete dams usually consider the measurement of displacements of points of the structure and of its foundation. In the more important concrete dams, displacements measurement involves the simultaneous use of different methods, such as rockmeters, pendulums and applied geodesy. For the measurement of planimetric displacements, two methods have long been applied: one uses pendulums, placed inside the structure; the other makes use of applied geodesy. These monitoring methods are complementary, and coexist in many Portuguese large concrete dams since the 1940’s. Pendulums have the advantage of being more precise and, nowadays, can easily be included in automatic data acquisition systems. Geodetic methods can give information not only on the dam but also on the foundation and surrounding terrain. Because they are more expensive, geodetic campaigns are much less frequent, but are very important for the validation of the pendulums readings. In this paper a comparison between these two methods is made using the monitoring data of a Portuguese large concrete dam and some considerations about the LNEC experience on their use are presented.pt_BR
dc.format.extent2050099 bytespt_BR
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_BR
dc.subjectObservação de deslocamentos planimétricospt_BR
dc.subjectBarragem de alquevapt_BR
dc.titleMonitoring planimetric displacements in concrete damspt_BR
dc.typeconferenceObjectpt_BR
dc.identifier.localedicaoLisboapt_BR
dc.description.pages11ppt_BR
dc.identifier.seminario13th FIG Symposium on Deformation Measurement and Analysispt_BR
dc.identifier.localLNEC, Lisboapt_BR
dc.description.sectorDBB/NOpt_BR
dc.description.year2008pt_BR
dc.description.data12 a 15 Março de 2008pt_BR
Appears in Collections:DBB/NO - Comunicações a congressos e artigos de revista

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MeasuringChanges_TCastro_MJoao.pdf2 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.