Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.lnec.pt:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1018073
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRanesi, A.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorVeiga, M. R.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, M. P.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFaria, P.pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-18T14:17:02Zpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-16T13:32:52Z-
dc.date.available2024-12-18T14:17:02Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2025-04-16T13:32:52Z-
dc.date.issued2024-08-15pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.109701pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace2.lnec.pt:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1018073pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.lnec.pt:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1018073-
dc.description.abstractPlasters can be finished with paint systems that can affect their moisture storage and transport properties. To confirm that, eight traditional and modern plastering mortars and pastes – based on cement, natural hydraulic lime, air lime, earth and gypsum - were coated with a vinyl paint (A) and an acrylic paint (B) and underwent the same hygroscopic characterization of the bare mortar samples. The effect of paint system A on water vapor adsorption and moisture buffering was small, in some cases positive. However, all the plasters painted with system A showed lower water vapor permeability than the bare plasters. The variation in the thickness of equivalent air layer was not the same for all the plastering mortars and pastes, suggesting that the different plastering substrates were still involved in the hygroscopic mechanism. The application of paint system B, instead, significantly reduced the hygroscopic behavior of the plasters, leveling their responses. The two paints, produced for different scopes and so with different kind and contents of constituents, have a diverse effect on those properties. Therefore, to optimize the passive contribution that plasters may have to indoor comfort, it is important to make a conscious choice when choosing paint finishing systems.pt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.publisherELSEVIERpt_BR
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_BR
dc.subjectCoatingpt_BR
dc.subjectMoisture bufferpt_BR
dc.subjectWater vapor permeabilitypt_BR
dc.subjectVinyl paintpt_BR
dc.subjectAcrylic paintpt_BR
dc.titleThe different effect of two paint systems on moisture buffer capacity of traditional and modern plasterspt_BR
dc.typearticlept_BR
dc.description.volumeV. 91pt_BR
dc.description.sectorDED/NRIpt_BR
dc.description.magazineJournal of Building Engineeringpt_BR
dc.contributor.peer-reviewedSIMpt_BR
dc.contributor.academicresearchersSIMpt_BR
dc.contributor.arquivoSIMpt_BR
Appears in Collections:DED/NRI - Comunicações a congressos e artigos de revista

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
NRI_Differente_Effect_two_paint_2024.pdfDocumento cedido por um dos autores. Direitos reservados aos autores e editora.5.44 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.