Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://repositorio.lnec.pt:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1003995
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Alejano, L. | pt_BR |
dc.contributor.author | González, J. | pt_BR |
dc.contributor.author | Muralha, J. | pt_BR |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-11-06T17:19:39Z | pt_BR |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-05-24T16:23:49Z | pt_BR |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-10-09T14:06:50Z | pt_BR |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-04-13T08:58:55Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-11-06T17:19:39Z | pt_BR |
dc.date.available | 2013-05-24T16:23:49Z | pt_BR |
dc.date.available | 2014-10-09T14:06:50Z | pt_BR |
dc.date.available | 2017-04-13T08:58:55Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012-11 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.citation | Rock Mech Rock Eng (2012) 45:1023–1035 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.issn | 0723-2632 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repositorio.lnec.pt/jspui/handle/123456789/1003995 | - |
dc.description.abstract | A relevant parameter for estimating discontinuity shear strength is the basic friction angle, usually derived from different types of tilt tests. However, the tilt tests described in the literature produce varying basic friction angle values. From a large number of different types of tilt tests on different kinds of rocks, it was possible to conclude that the mechanisms of sliding along cylinder generatrixes and planar surfaces are quite different, and that tests based on sliding along generatrixes are not appropriate for determining reliable basic friction angle values for discontinuity planes. Tests on small specimens are also not recommended, for geometry reasons and because ensuring reliable stress conditions is difficult. To quantify the natural variability in tilt testing, large specimens of the same granite were tested. The results revealed coefficients of variation for the basic friction angle in the range of 5–10 %, a variability which is no greater than that found for other rock mechanics parameters. This observation enables to forward some recommendations concerning the appropriate number of tests needed to obtain reliable results. | pt_BR |
dc.language.iso | eng | pt_BR |
dc.publisher | Springer | pt_BR |
dc.rights | openAccess | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Basic friction angle | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Tilt testing | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Variability assessment | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Joint strength | pt_BR |
dc.title | Comparison of different techniques of tilt testing and basic friction angle assessment | pt_BR |
dc.type | article | pt_BR |
dc.description.figures | 12 | pt_BR |
dc.description.tables | 5 | pt_BR |
dc.description.pages | 1023–1035pp | pt_BR |
dc.description.volume | Vol 45; Nr 6 | pt_BR |
dc.description.sector | DBB/NFOS | pt_BR |
dc.description.magazine | Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering | pt_BR |
Appears in Collections: | DBB/NMMR - Comunicações a congressos e artigos de revista |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
10.1007_s00603-012-0265-7[1].pdf | 1.22 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.