Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.lnec.pt:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1003207
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGonçalves, T. D.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBrito, V.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPel, L.pt_BR
dc.contributor.editorDrying Technology: An International Journalpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-22T15:20:10Zpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-20T15:57:30Zpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-12T15:55:49Z-
dc.date.available2012-02-22T15:20:10Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2014-10-20T15:57:30Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2017-04-12T15:55:49Z-
dc.date.issued2012-02-17pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationT. Diaz Gonçalves,V. Brito, L. Pel (2012) Water Vapor Emission From Rigid Mesoporous Materials during the Constant Drying Rate Period Drying Technology, 30: 462–474. DOI: 10.1080/07373937.2011.647184.pt_BR
dc.identifier.issnISSN: 0737-3937 print; 1532-2300 onlinept_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.lnec.pt/jspui/handle/123456789/1003207-
dc.description.abstractIt has long been thought that the evaporation rate from mesoporous materials during the constant drying rate period (CDRP) is equal to that of a free-water surface, due to the presence of a liquid film covering the surface of the material. In this article we review several early articles and demonstrate that the experimental scrutiny this hypothesis has received is insufficient. Further, we report a set of evaporative drying experiments on eight building materials whose results also do not confirm such hypothesis. Indeed, the drying rate during the CDRP is not equal either among the tested materials or between these and the free-water surfaces. To explain the differences in drying rate, we have looked at the influence of surface texture and porosity. We have concluded that surface texture, which could increase the effective surface area of the materials, did not have a relevant effect on the CDRP drying rate. However, we have found a good correlation between the CDRP drying rate and capillary porosity. This is consistent with the hypothesis that drying occurs at the pore level during the CDRP. Further, it contradicts the suggestion that there is a film of water covering the surface of the materials during this period.pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was funded by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) under the research project DRYMASS (ref. PTDC/ECM/100553/2008). V. Brito was supported by a research grant provided under this project. We are thankful to Jo Ann Cassar (from University of Malta) for providing the Globigerina limestone samples and to Veerle Cnudde (from Ghent University) and Timo G. Nijland (from the Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research) for providing the Bentheimer sandstone samples. We also thank Ceraˆmica do Vale de Gandara for providing the brick samples. Finally, we acknowledge the support of National Laboratory for Civil Engineering (LNEC) technicians who helped with different aspects of the experimental work: Luís Nunes, Joaão Júnior, José Costa, and Joaão Ribeiro.pt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.publisherTaylor & Francispt_BR
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_BR
dc.subjectConstant drying rate periodpt_BR
dc.subjectDrying ratept_BR
dc.subjectHeat and mass transferpt_BR
dc.subjectPore networkpt_BR
dc.subjectPorous mediapt_BR
dc.titleWater Vapor Emission From Rigid Mesoporous Materials during the Constant Drying Rate Periodpt_BR
dc.typearticlept_BR
dc.description.figures19pt_BR
dc.description.tables3pt_BR
dc.description.pages12pt_BR
dc.description.volume30pt_BR
dc.description.sectorDM/NPCpt_BR
dc.description.magazineDrying Technologypt_BR
Appears in Collections:DM/NMC - Comunicações a congressos e artigos de revista

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Drying Technology 30, 462–474, 2012 - ABSTRACT.pdf143.76 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.