Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.lnec.pt:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/18207
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, A.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorKim, J.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorDuarte, S.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRibeiro Nunes, L. M.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorLloyd, J.pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-13T14:05:16Zpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-22T16:56:20Zpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-09T14:54:34Zpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-13T09:10:27Z-
dc.date.available2010-04-13T14:05:16Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2010-04-22T16:56:20Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2014-10-09T14:54:34Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2017-04-13T09:10:27Z-
dc.date.issued2010-05pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.lnec.pt/jspui/handle/123456789/18207-
dc.description.abstractIn-ground monitoring stations and termite baits are widely used in the southern United States with the intent of detecting and eradicating subterranean termite activity near buildings. These stations comprise a wood (or other cellulose material) substrate (monitor) and perhaps a termiticidal toxicant (bait) held m a plastic cage that allows for both, easy examination and access by termites. The usual practice is to inspect the station monitors for termite aetiv1ty every few months. If termites are detected, a bait is added to ar replaces the untreated monitor. However, in addition to termite attack, the monitors are subject to fungal decay, and rapid decay in high hazard areas is interfering with the usefulness of this baiting approach. This paper reports on an evaluation of the relative decay susceptibility of termite baiting systems used in commercial monitoring stations. Some monitors are very susceptible to wetting and fungal decay. corroborating anecdotal evidence from the field. It was eonc1uded that decay in high hazard areas is likely to interfere with the usefulness of some of these systems. To be used successfully, possible approaches to overcome the decay issue are: careful selection of the system used; placement on or above ground rather than in the ground; recognition that monitors and/or baits need to be changed every few months; avoiding remote sensing systems that do not allow a visual check of the monitor; developing durable m0nitors and baits, e.g., with the addition of a non-termite-repellent fungicide.pt_BR
dc.description.sponsorshipThe support of the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology is acknowledged (PTDC/ECM/099121/2008) along tith the support of Nisus Corporation.pt_BR
dc.format.extent247803 bytespt_BR
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofseriesComunicaçãopt_BR
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_BR
dc.subjectBaitspt_BR
dc.subjectDecaypt_BR
dc.subjectFungicidept_BR
dc.subjectMonitor stationspt_BR
dc.subjectSubterranean termitespt_BR
dc.subjectTermiticidept_BR
dc.titlePreventing decay in termite monitoring stationspt_BR
dc.typeconferenceObjectpt_BR
dc.description.tables8pt_BR
dc.description.pages12ppt_BR
dc.identifier.seminario41st Annual Meetingpt_BR
dc.identifier.localBiarritz, francept_BR
dc.identifier.localizacao6M2pt_BR
dc.description.sectorDE/NEMpt_BR
dc.name.labelEstruturas de Madeirapt_BR
dc.identifier.proc0303/11/17709pt_BR
dc.description.year2010pt_BR
dc.description.data9 to 13 Maypt_BR
Appears in Collections:DE/NCE - Comunicações a congressos e artigos de revista

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Preventing decay in termite monitoring stations.pdf242 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.