Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.lnec.pt:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1015594
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDuarte, M.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorAlmeida, N.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFalcão Silva, M. J.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRezvani, S.pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-13T12:54:27Zpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-28T10:48:15Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-13T12:54:27Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2023-02-28T10:48:15Z-
dc.date.issued2021-08-15pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.lnec.pt/jspui/handle/123456789/1015594-
dc.description.abstractIn recent decades, there has been an increase in the frequency and intensity of natural disasters. The worldwide growth of population, and consequently of infrastructure, increases the exposure to risks of this type. The expectation that the frequency of such disasters will increase amplifies the need to act today, to minimize the associated economic risks and costs in the future. The ability of buildings to maintain or restore their functionality after disruptive events, within a certain period, has increasingly attracted the attention of academics and profession-als. This work intends to study and develop a method to measure the resilience of built assets. Therefore, a resilience classification system is proposed, which assesses resilience according to 5 dimensions (environmental, economic, organizational, so-cial, and technical), which are subdivided into 16 indicators and 75 parameters. This proposal is based on various existent systems such as REDi or Building Scorecard, and its applicability is tested with 11 buildings with varied uses. The results are analysed via SPSS using a Pearson correlation coefficient matrix and clustering techniques. These empirical cases allowed improvements in the system initially pro-posed. The proposed resilience classification system allows classifying and com-paring the performance of buildings, identifying their vulnerabilities, essential in-formation to establish investment priorities. Multiple stakeholders are involved in the life cycle of buildings that may benefit from the developed proposal. The work carried out is in its early stages of development and includes the identification of improvements to be developed in future work.pt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.publisherWCEAM 2021 – 15th World Conference on Engineering Asset Managementpt_BR
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_BR
dc.subjectNatural disasterspt_BR
dc.subjectmeasure the resiliencept_BR
dc.subjectlife cyclept_BR
dc.titleResilience rating system for buildings against natural hazardspt_BR
dc.typeconferenceObjectpt_BR
dc.description.pages57-68pppt_BR
dc.identifier.localBrasilpt_BR
dc.description.sectorDED/NEGpt_BR
dc.identifier.conftitleWCEAM 2021 – 15th World Conference on Engineering Asset Managementpt_BR
dc.contributor.peer-reviewedSIMpt_BR
dc.contributor.academicresearchersSIMpt_BR
dc.contributor.arquivoSIMpt_BR
Appears in Collections:DED/NEG - Comunicações a congressos e artigos de revista

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
CAEC201.pdfResilience rating system for buildings against natural hazards378.99 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.