Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.lnec.pt:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/17223
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMenezes, M.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorVasconcelos, L.pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2009-11-09T10:46:38Zpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-22T09:23:31Zpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-10T09:44:16Zpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-13T11:25:14Z-
dc.date.available2009-11-09T10:46:38Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2010-04-22T09:23:31Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2014-10-10T09:44:16Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2017-04-13T11:25:14Z-
dc.date.issued2009-07pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.lnec.pt/jspui/handle/123456789/17223-
dc.description.abstractThe need to establish an interactive relation between the needs, problems and the social, physical and urban potentialities of the territories requires being transversal, when developing a plan, a project, an intervention and urban management aiming sustainability. Theoretically, interactive approaches to the territory already acquired its own status and support and guide reflection and action. However, the creation of mechanisms for implementation, supporting and developing this interactive and multidimensional principle in/with the territory is still far from easy. This paper draws from the experiences of two Portuguese cases while exploring new innovative ways to develop sustainable public urban policies of socio-territorial intervention in vulnerable critical contexts. The aim is to reflect on the methodological aspects considered fundamental in the context of the preparation and consolidation of socio-territorial intervention dynamics. The authors recur to two case discussing namely the following aspects: (1) interactive objectives confronted with a rigid functional responsibilities strongly centred in technical expertise; (2) assurance of the process continuity towards the implementation of the plan of action collaboratively developed; (3) who should be involved in the identification of needs, problems and urban socio-physical potentialities. The two case studies will be used to illustrate the issues brought up by this reflection. Finally, through the lessons learned from these two experiences, the authors discuss the relevance of the component of technical and methodological support in the context of the construction and consolidation of the participatory process and urban governance.pt_BR
dc.format.extent21299 bytespt_BR
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfpt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_BR
dc.subjectSocio-territorial interventionpt_BR
dc.subjectVulnerable critical contextspt_BR
dc.subjectMethodological supportpt_BR
dc.subjectParticipatory process and urban governancept_BR
dc.title(In)compatibilities of the socio-urbanistic process - Methodological challengespt_BR
dc.typeconferenceObjectpt_BR
dc.identifier.seminario23 rd Congress of the association of European schools of planning.pt_BR
dc.identifier.localLiverpool, U.K.pt_BR
dc.description.sectorDED/NESOpt_BR
dc.description.year2009pt_BR
dc.description.data15 a 18 Julhopt_BR
Appears in Collections:DED/NUT - Comunicações a congressos e artigos de revista

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Incompatibilities.pdf20.8 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.