Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.lnec.pt:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1018214
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPulatsu, B.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorWilson, R.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorLemos, J. V.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorMojsilovic. N.pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-03T16:09:11Zpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-16T13:35:08Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-03T16:09:11Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2025-04-16T13:35:08Z-
dc.date.issued2024pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationhttps://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures9010011pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.lnec.pt:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1018214-
dc.description.abstractThe unreinforced masonry (URM) walls are the common load-bearing structural elements in most existing buildings, consisting of masonry units (bricks) and mortar joints. They indicate a highly nonlinear and complex behaviour when subjected to combined compression-shear load-ing influenced by different factors, such as pre-compression load and boundary conditions, among many others, which makes predicting their structural response challenging. To this end, the present study offers a discontinuum-based modelling strategy based on the discrete element method (DEM) to investigate the in-plane cyclic response of URM panels under different vertical pressures with and without a damp-proof course (DPC) membrane. The adopted modelling strategy represents URM walls as a group of discrete rigid block systems interacting along their boundaries through the contact points. A novel contact constitutive model addressing the elasto-softening stress-displacement behaviour of unit-mortar interfaces and the associated stiffness degradation in tension-compression regimes is adopted within the implemented discontinuum-based modelling framework. The proposed modelling strategy is validated by comparing a re-cent experimental campaign where the essential data regarding geometrical features, material properties and loading histories are obtained. The results show that while the proposed compu-tational modelling strategy can accurately capture the hysteric response of URM walls without the DPC membrane, it may underestimate the load-carrying capacity for URM walls with the DPC membrane.pt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.publisherMDPIpt_BR
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesspt_BR
dc.subjectUnreinforced masonrypt_BR
dc.titleExploring the Cyclic Behaviour of URM Walls with and without Damp-Proof Course (DPC) Membranes through Discrete Element Methodpt_BR
dc.typeworkingPaperpt_BR
dc.description.volume9(1), 11pt_BR
dc.description.sectorDBB/NMMRpt_BR
dc.description.magazineInfrastructurespt_BR
dc.contributor.peer-reviewedSIMpt_BR
dc.contributor.academicresearchersSIMpt_BR
dc.contributor.arquivoNAOpt_BR
Appears in Collections:DBB/NMMR - Comunicações a congressos e artigos de revista

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.