Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.lnec.pt:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1016914
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCintura, E.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFaria, P.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorDuarte, M.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorLina Nunespt_BR
dc.contributor.editorJose M. Adampt_BR
dc.contributor.editorMichael Fordept_BR
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-11T11:48:27Zpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-05T15:26:03Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-11T11:48:27Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2024-03-05T15:26:03Z-
dc.date.issued2023-09pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132665pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn0950-0618pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.lnec.pt/jspui/handle/123456789/1016914-
dc.description.abstractLaboratory tests were carried out to evaluate the feasibility of producing boards or coating panels with good hygrothermal performance by using different agro-industrial wastes (grape and olive press wastes, hazelnut shells, spent coffee and pine) and adhesives (gypsum-based binder, sodium silicate solution and starch-based glue). Hygrothermal properties and resistance to mould growth, including the effect of citric acid, were evaluated. The results highlighted the benefits and drawbacks of each adhesive: the binder seems more adequate to produce bio-based plastering mortars than boards; the other adhesives seem efficient solutions to produce boards with good hygrothermal properties; for the natural glue the bio-susceptibility needs improvement.pt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.publisherElsevier, Ltd.pt_BR
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_BR
dc.subjectAir limept_BR
dc.subjectBiological susceptibilitypt_BR
dc.subjectBio-wastept_BR
dc.subjectCitric acidpt_BR
dc.subjectHemihydrate gypsumpt_BR
dc.subjectHygroscopicitypt_BR
dc.subjectNatural gluept_BR
dc.subjectSodium Silicatept_BR
dc.subjectStarchpt_BR
dc.subjectThermal propertypt_BR
dc.titleEco-efficient boards with agro-industrial wastes – Assessment of different adhesivespt_BR
dc.typearticlept_BR
dc.description.pages15p.pt_BR
dc.description.commentsThis research was funded by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT- Fundaç˜ao para a Ciˆencia e a Tecnologia), with Ph. D. grant PD/BD/150579/2020, as part of the Eco-Construction and Rehabilitation Program (EcoCoRe). The authors are grateful for the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology support through funding UIDB/04625/2020 of the research unit CERIS. The authors acknowledge Professor Bruno Esteves, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, and Professor Susana Filipe Barreiros, NOVA School of Science and Technology, NOVA University of Lisbon, for their help in providing some of the materials used in this work. The authors are grateful to Mirko Braga (Ingessil S.r.l.) for the chemical analysis of the sodium silicate solution. The authors acknowledge Professor Ines Flores-Colen and Professor Maria da Gl´oria Gomes, Instituto Superior T´ecnico, University of Lisbon, for making available the thermal conductivity equipment, and S´onia Duarte, National Laboratory for Civil Engineering, for the help provided for the statistical analysis.pt_BR
dc.description.volumeVolume 404, 132665pt_BR
dc.description.sectorDE/NCEpt_BR
dc.description.magazineConstruction and Building Materialspt_BR
dc.contributor.peer-reviewedSIMpt_BR
dc.contributor.academicresearchersSIMpt_BR
dc.contributor.arquivoSIMpt_BR
Appears in Collections:DE/NCE - Comunicações a congressos e artigos de revista



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.