Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.lnec.pt:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1013822
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMendes, L. S.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorLara, J. L.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorViseu, T.pt_BR
dc.contributor.editorRita F. Carvalho, Corrado Gisonnipt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-23T11:34:01Zpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-01T10:37:07Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-23T11:34:01Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2021-07-01T10:37:07Z-
dc.date.issued2021-05-29pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationhttps://doi.org/10.3390/w13111535pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.lnec.pt/jspui/handle/123456789/1013822-
dc.description.abstractAir entrainment is common in free surface flows in large hydraulic structures (e.g., spillways, chutes, energy dissipation structures) and must be considered to assure an effective and safe operation. Due to the large size of the prototype structures, it is infeasible to model individual air bubbles. Therefore, using the OpenFOAM toolbox, an efficient simulation model for aerated flows is developed for engineering purposes. The Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations and the volume-of-fluid method are coupled with a sub-grid bubble population model that simulates entrainment and transport. A comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness, computational cost, and reliability is performed. Local and continuum bubble entrainment are evaluated in two distinct flows: an impinging jet and along a spillway chute. Aeration is induced, respectively, by a shear flow and by the thickening of the turbulent boundary layer. Moreover, a detailed sensitivity analysis of the model’s parameters is conducted. Calibration and validation are performed against experimental and prototype data. Among the analyzed entrainment formulations, the one depending exclusively on the turbulent kinetic energy is the only applicable to different flow types. Good accuracy is found, meeting engineering standards, and the additional computation cost is marginal. Results depend primarily on the volume-of-fluid method ability to reproduce the interface. Calibration is straightforward in self-aeration but more difficult for local aeration.pt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.publisherMDPIpt_BR
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_BR
dc.subjectLocal aerationpt_BR
dc.subjectFree-surface aerationpt_BR
dc.subjectVolume-of-fluidpt_BR
dc.subjectSub-grid bubble equationpt_BR
dc.subjectHydraulic structurept_BR
dc.titleIs the Volume-of-Fluid Method Coupled with a Sub-Grid Bubble Equation Efficient for Simulating Local and Continuum Aeration?pt_BR
dc.typearticlept_BR
dc.description.pages27ppt_BR
dc.description.commentsCopyright: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0pt_BR
dc.description.volume13, 1535pt_BR
dc.description.sectorDHA/NREpt_BR
dc.description.magazineWATERpt_BR
dc.contributor.peer-reviewedSIMpt_BR
dc.contributor.academicresearchersSIMpt_BR
dc.contributor.arquivoSIMpt_BR
Appears in Collections:DHA/NRE - Comunicações a congressos e artigos de revista



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.