Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.lnec.pt:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1012682
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSanchez-Vila, X.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorLobo Ferreira, J. P. C.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorRossetto, R.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorEscalante , E.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSapiano, M.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSchüth , C.pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-01T14:02:42Zpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-22T10:59:45Z-
dc.date.available2020-06-01T14:02:42Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2020-06-22T10:59:45Z-
dc.date.issued2018-06-08pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationHydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 3213–3227, 2018pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.lnec.pt/jspui/handle/123456789/1012682-
dc.description.abstractManaged aquifer recharge (MAR) can be affected by many risks. Those risks are related to different technical and non-technical aspects of recharge, like water availability, water quality, legislation, social issues, etc. Many other works have acknowledged risks of this nature theoretically; however, their quantification and definition has not been developed. In this study, the risk definition and quantification has been performed by means of “fault trees” and probabilistic risk assessment (PRA). We defined a fault tree with 65 basic events applicable to the operation phase. After that, we have applied this methodology to six different managed aquifer recharge sites located in the Mediterranean Basin (Portugal, Spain, Italy, Malta, and Israel). The probabilities of the basic events were defined by expert criteria, based on the knowledge of the different managers of the facilities. From that, we conclude that in all sites, the perception of the expert criteria of the non-technical aspects were as much or even more important than the technical aspects. Regarding the risk results, we observe that the total risk in three of the six sites was equal to or above 0.90. That would mean that the MAR facilities have a risk of failure equal to or higher than 90% in the period of 2–6 years. The other three sites presented lower risks (75, 29, and 18% for Malta, Menashe, and Serchio, respectively).pt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.publisherPublished by Copernicus Publicationspt_BR
dc.relationComissão Europeia Progrma FP7pt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofseriesHydrol. Earth Syst.;https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3213-2018pt_BR
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_BR
dc.subjectManaged aquifer recharge (MAR)pt_BR
dc.subjectrisk assessmentpt_BR
dc.titleA risk assessment methodology to evaluate the risk failure of managed aquifer recharge in the Mediterranean Basinpt_BR
dc.typearticlept_BR
dc.identifier.localedicaoEuropean Geosciences Unionpt_BR
dc.description.commentshttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/325652981_A_risk_assessment_methodology_to_evaluate_the_risk_failure_of_managed_aquifer_recharge_in_the_Mediterranean_Basinpt_BR
dc.description.volume22, 3213–3227, 2018pt_BR
dc.description.sectorCD/CDpt_BR
dc.identifier.proc0102/111/1893801pt_BR
dc.description.magazineHydrol. Earth Syst Sci.pt_BR
dc.contributor.peer-reviewedSIMpt_BR
dc.contributor.academicresearchersSIMpt_BR
dc.contributor.arquivoSIMpt_BR
Appears in Collections:CD - Comunicações a congressos e artigos de revista

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
hess-22-3213-2018.pdfArtigo1.99 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.