Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.lnec.pt:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1010042
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNarra, P.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCoelho, C.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorSancho, F. E.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorPalalane, J.pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-15T14:50:49Zpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-01T15:38:42Z-
dc.date.available2017-11-15T14:50:49Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2018-03-01T15:38:42Z-
dc.date.issued2017-06pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.03.013pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.lnec.pt/jspui/handle/123456789/1010042-
dc.description.abstractCoastal zones are socially and economically very important, leading to a high pressure for its permanent development. Simultaneously, these zones are subject to several maritime hazards, able to cause coastal erosion. Therefore, a thoughtful management of these zones is required in order to protect society, economy and natural environments. This work presents a GIS-based tool that aims to provide a quick assessment to coastal erosion risk, called CERA: Coastal Erosion Risk Assessment. The simple processes and small amount of data required by the tool provides a viable alternative to other methods, which are often more complex and difficult to apply. The assessment method used in CERA is divided in two parts. The first part is a vulnerability assessment, which combines several parameters that influence coastal erosion, each being classified in a scale of 1e5. The second part, a consequence assessment, follows the same procedure, but considering socio-economic aspects. Then, a risk matrix is applied to determine a risk classification, also divided in 5 classes, from I to V. Aveiro, in Portugal, and Macaneta spit, in Mozambique, were selected to test the application. Data was gathered for both locations. While in Aveiro it was used a considerable amount of available georeferenced data, for the Macaneta spit the data was mainly prevenient from previous publications and local expert knowledge. The results show that both study areas have similar vulnerabilities to coastal erosion, with classes IV and V dominating along the areas closer to the shoreline. On the other hand, the consequence classification in Aveiro is higher than in Macaneta, resulting in a higher risk level in several regions in Aveiro district. The higher level of detail in Aveiro data also resulted in a more even distribution across all class levels in the results. ©pt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.publisherElsevierpt_BR
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesspt_BR
dc.subjectVulnerabilitypt_BR
dc.subjectConsequencept_BR
dc.subjectHazardpt_BR
dc.subjectExposurept_BR
dc.subjectGISpt_BR
dc.subjectAveiropt_BR
dc.subjectMacanetapt_BR
dc.titleCera: an open-source tool for coastal erosion risk assessmentpt_BR
dc.typeworkingPaperpt_BR
dc.description.pages1-14pppt_BR
dc.description.volume142pt_BR
dc.description.sectorDHA/NECpt_BR
dc.description.magazineOcean & Coastal Managementpt_BR
dc.contributor.peer-reviewedSIMpt_BR
dc.contributor.academicresearchersNAOpt_BR
dc.contributor.arquivoNAOpt_BR
Appears in Collections:DHA/NEC - Comunicações a congressos e artigos de revista

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.