Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.lnec.pt:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1002972
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBranco Pedro, J.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBoueri, J.pt_BR
dc.contributor.editorRuddock, Les; Chynoweth, Paulpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-06T09:43:34Zpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-10T09:45:35Zpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-12T13:41:01Z-
dc.date.available2012-01-06T09:43:34Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2014-10-10T09:45:35Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2017-04-12T13:41:01Z-
dc.date.issued2011-09pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationCOBRA 2011. Proceedings of. RICS Construction and Property. Conferencept_BR
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-907842-19-1pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.lnec.pt/jspui/handle/123456789/1002972-
dc.description.abstractThis paper compares the space standards set for affordable housing in Portugal and in São Paulo Municipality (Brazil), and seeks explanations for differences in the socioeconomic context of each territory. The Controlled Cost Housing (CCH) in Portugal and the housing built within the program My Home My Life (MHML) in São Paulo Municipality are studied. Three research questions are addressed: Which program has more demanding space standards? Which social-economic conditions explain the differences in space standards? How different space standards influence the users’ satisfaction? To answer these questions, space standards, socio-economic indicators and the users’ satisfaction are compared. Space standards compared the number and type of rooms, the internal floor area of dwellings, the size of rooms, and the size of furniture and equipment. The study has shown that space standards set for CCH are more demanding than those set for MHML program. For instance, a CCH dwelling has almost two times the gross area of a MHML dwelling with the same number of rooms. The housing deficit, the low income of poor households and the option to sell highly subsidized affordable housing are reasons that justify the low space standards in São Paulo Municipality when compared to Portugal. Although affordable houses are substantially smaller in São Paulo Municipality, the satisfaction level of dwellers with the size of dwellings is higher. Therefore, a direct link between space standards and users’ satisfaction cannot be set. We conclude that different political options on how to provide housing to low income households directly influence the space standards set for dwellings.pt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.publisherRICS & University of Salfordpt_BR
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_BR
dc.subjectBrazilpt_BR
dc.subjectPortugalpt_BR
dc.subjectAffordable housingpt_BR
dc.subjectSpace standardspt_BR
dc.titleAffordable housing in Portugal and São Paulo Municipality: Comparison of space standards and socio-economic indicatorspt_BR
dc.typeconferenceObjectpt_BR
dc.identifier.localedicaoSalfordpt_BR
dc.description.figures6 figpt_BR
dc.description.tables11 tabelaspt_BR
dc.description.pages329-353 p.pt_BR
dc.identifier.seminarioCOBRA 2011 – RICS Construction and Property Conferencept_BR
dc.identifier.localSchool of the Built Environment. University of Salfordpt_BR
dc.identifier.localizacaoCD-Rompt_BR
dc.description.sectorDED/NAUpt_BR
dc.description.year2011pt_BR
dc.description.data12-13 septemberpt_BR
Appears in Collections:DED/NUT - Comunicações a congressos e artigos de revista

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ci27 - Social housing in Portugal and in the Municipality of São Paulo.pdf785.89 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.