Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.lnec.pt:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1002106
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCouto, S.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGonçalves, T. D.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorGrandão Lopes, J.pt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2011-06-03T09:18:12Zpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-20T15:58:49Zpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-13T10:31:52Z-
dc.date.available2011-06-03T09:18:12Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2014-10-20T15:58:49Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2017-04-13T10:31:52Z-
dc.date.issued2011-05-12pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationS. Couto, T. D. Gonçalves and J. M. G. Lopes (2011) Drying of red ceramic brick. Effect of five silicone-based water-repellent treatments. In Proc. Hydrophobe VI – Int. Conf. on Water Repellent Treatment of Building Materials, Istituto Superiore per la Conservazione ed il Restauro (ISCR), Rome, Italy, 12-13 May, pp 81-92. Ernesto Borrelli ed Vasco Fassina (ed), Aedificatio Publishers, Germany.pt_BR
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-931681-99-9pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.lnec.pt/jspui/handle/123456789/1002106-
dc.description.abstractThe presence of moisture inside a material whose surface was treated with a water repellent agent may give rise to unwanted side-effects. Indeed, the temporal and spatial significance of moistening events may be intensified if a water-repellent, as any other kind of treatment, hinders drying. This effect can be particularly relevant for historical buildings, where moisture from varied origins is recurrently present in the masonry, but is also pertinent for more recent constructions since water often finds ways to penetrate the building elements, through cracks or joints. This article discusses the application of water repellent treatments on ceramic brick, with regard to drying of the masonry. The influence of cracks parallel or perpendicular to the surface is taken into account. Five silicone-based treatments were studied. The treated or untreated material was subjected to capillary absorption tests by which the effectiveness of the water repellent effect was estimated, as well as water vapour permeability tests and drying tests. The effectiveness of four out of the five treatments is high. Vapour permeability is not much affected in one case, when the cracks are parallel to the surface, and in none of the cases, when they are perpendicular. Nonetheless, drying is significantly delayed by any of the five products, both in the case where the cracks are parallel to the surface as when they are perpendicular.pt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_BR
dc.subjectCeramic brickpt_BR
dc.subjectWater-repellentpt_BR
dc.subjectHydrophobicpt_BR
dc.subjectSurface treatmentpt_BR
dc.subjectDryingpt_BR
dc.titleDrying of red ceramic brick. Effect of five silicone-based water-repellent treatments.pt_BR
dc.typemasterThesispt_BR
dc.identifier.localedicaoRomapt_BR
dc.description.figures7pt_BR
dc.description.tables2pt_BR
dc.description.pages81-92pt_BR
dc.description.sectorDM/NPCpt_BR
Appears in Collections:DM/NMC - Comunicações a congressos e artigos de revista

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
SC+TG+GL - Article I Hydrophobe VI.pdf265.71 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.