Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.lnec.pt:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1013602
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSousa, J.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCorreia, J. R.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorFirmo, João P.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorCabral-Fonseca, S.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorJ. GONILHApt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-24T17:21:39Zpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-05T15:01:15Z-
dc.date.available2021-03-24T17:21:39Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2021-04-05T15:01:15Z-
dc.date.issued2018-02-27pt_BR
dc.identifier.citation10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.02.081pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.lnec.pt:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1013602-
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents an experimental study about the effects of thermal cycles on adhesively bonded joints between pultruded glass fibre reinforced polyester (GFRP) adherends used in civil engineering structural applications. Single lap bonded joints were produced with two commercial polymeric adhesives - epoxy (EP) and polyurethane (PUR) - and exposed to a mild (Mediterranean) range of thermal variations (-5 °C to 40 °C) for up to 350 cycles in a dry condition. The mechanical performance of the adhesively bonded joints was assessed by means of single lap shear tests. Regardless of the inherent differences between both adhesives, results obtained show that the global effect of thermal cycles on the load vs. displacement response of EP-GFRP and PUR-GFRP joints was similar. For both adhesives, thermal cycles caused considerable reduction of joint stiffness and strength, with maximum reductions of 18% and 22% for EP-GFRP joints, respectively, and 19% and 11% for PUR GFRP joints. The degradation of performance was influenced by post-curing effects, more relevant in the PUR adhesive. Before exposure to thermal cycles, both types of specimens exhibited similar failure mechanisms, which generally (80-90% of cases) involved light fibre tear and fibre tear modes, attesting the effectiveness of the adhesion process and material compatibility. Exposure to thermal cycles did not influence the failure modes of the PUR-GFRP joints; however, EP-GFRP joints became more prone to adhesive failure after being subjected to thermal cycles. Overall, the results obtained indicate that thermal cycles degrade bonded joints between pultruded GFRP adherends; however, for the conditions used in this study, this degradation seems to be compatible with the structural use of this type of joints in civil infrastructure.pt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.publisherElsevier Ltdpt_BR
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesspt_BR
dc.subjectPultruded GFRP adherendspt_BR
dc.subjectPolyurethanept_BR
dc.subjectEpoxypt_BR
dc.subjectAdesively bonded jointspt_BR
dc.subjectThermal cyclespt_BR
dc.subjectDurabilitypt_BR
dc.titleEffects of thermal cycles on adhesively bonded joints between pultruded GFRP adherendspt_BR
dc.typeworkingPaperpt_BR
dc.description.pages518-529pt_BR
dc.description.volume202pt_BR
dc.description.sectorDM/NMOpt_BR
dc.description.magazineComposite Structurespt_BR
dc.contributor.peer-reviewedSIMpt_BR
dc.contributor.academicresearchersSIMpt_BR
dc.contributor.arquivoNAOpt_BR
Appears in Collections:DM/NMO - Comunicações a congressos e artigos de revista

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.