Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.lnec.pt:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1003089
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVilhena, A.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBranco Pedro, J.pt_BR
dc.contributor.authorBrito, J.pt_BR
dc.contributor.editorFREITAS, V. P.; CORVACHO, H.; LACASSE, Michaelpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-31T21:24:14Zpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-10T10:32:26Zpt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-13T09:01:01Z-
dc.date.available2012-01-31T21:24:14Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2014-10-10T10:32:26Zpt_BR
dc.date.available2017-04-13T09:01:01Z-
dc.date.issued2011-04pt_BR
dc.identifier.isbn978-972-752-132-6pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.lnec.pt:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/1003089-
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents a comparative analysis of methods used in European countries to assess buildings’ condition. The following methods were compared: a Portuguese method to assess buildings condition, an English housing health and safety rating system, a French method to assess buildings that may be declared inhabitable, a Dutch standard about buildings condition assessment and the assessment methods developed within the European projects EPIQR & TOBUS. The comparative analysis included three tasks. First, each of the methods was described separately. Then, the main features of the methods were compared. Finally, some guidelines to improve the Portuguese method were drawn. The main differences of the methods are the objectives and scope of the assessment, the disaggregation level of the global assessment, the calculation formula used to aggregate partial assessments, the type final results obtained and the tools developed for their implementation. The main similarities are that the assessment is carried out mainly by visual inspection, the condition of the building is assessed by a systematic analysis of the entire building divided into functional elements, the severity of defects is the assessment criterion used, weighting coefficients are used to determine the importance of each partial assessment in the final result and surveyors need specific training. The recommendations about the Portuguese method are to maintain the present assessment model, to carry out the training courses of surveyors, to create a complementary tool for the diagnosis of the causes of defects and to develop a computer program to support surveyors during inspections.pt_BR
dc.language.isoengpt_BR
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVol.;3pt_BR
dc.rightsopenAccesspt_BR
dc.subjectBuilding pathologypt_BR
dc.subjectCondition assessmentpt_BR
dc.subjectBuildings conditionpt_BR
dc.subjectEuropean methodspt_BR
dc.titleComparison of methods used in European countries to assess buildings' condition.pt_BR
dc.typeconferenceObjectpt_BR
dc.identifier.localedicaoPortopt_BR
dc.description.figures0pt_BR
dc.description.tables1pt_BR
dc.description.pages7ppt_BR
dc.identifier.seminarioXII DBMC – 12th International Conference on Durability of Building Materials and Componentspt_BR
dc.identifier.localPortopt_BR
dc.description.sectorDED/NRIpt_BR
dc.description.year2011pt_BR
dc.description.data12 a 15 de abrilpt_BR
Appears in Collections:DED/NRI - Comunicações a congressos e artigos de revista

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
5.10.pdf139.75 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.